The Leirdal Blog - Internet

The future, 2.0

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:00:31 +0100

As a follow up to my earlier fantasy of new possibilities regarding a documented generation I would like to blow out some steam regarding social software as well.

One of the problems we see today is that there are only a few people producing the information that is consumed by all the rest. Those reading are participating with tagging, bookmarking and rating of the content, but even this should be easier. The production of the content could also be easier.

So let us play with the idea of a documented world. On our way forward we have a few stops on the way. Some of them we are experiencing right now, among else by using Facebook, Linked-In, Plaxo or other social networking applications. By blogging and micro-blogging what we do and what interests us we are giving the world knowledge and information that can be used by other applications as what we often call value-added content.

Consider this, you are watching a video or listening to a podcast on the net regarding some information. The video or audio is tagged in such a way that as you play the content, different meta-information rolls by in tandem with the content, and the media player might then display related information based on automated searches as you watch. We are talking hypermedia that intelligently can give you information that you need or want. You will be able to decide where the information is gathered from.

In the next generation of social software I expect us to be able to increase the value for each other in even better and easier ways than today. And as always, the enabler of these features will always be technology.

So in the future, expect great things. Probably not some of the small ideas I present to you here. What we will see will probably be better.

And you will be a part of it. By easily producing content, and adding meta-information and grading what you see. The world will give you more of what you want and of what interests you.

Whether it is semantic technology or intelligent search engines, I bid welcome to interesting and feature rich social networks, in a documented world where you can have an even more enhanced life experience.

Soon, in a life near you!

Are you documented?

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:28:34 +0100

In the future: You will be able to rewind your whole life. Everything you have ever done, ever said, ever seen and ever heard will be reviewable, analysable, searchable and last, but not least, available.

We are getting closer to something a lot of people are calling the documented generation. Even today most of what we do is documented in some way or other. I myself have used my archive of digital images gathered over several years to remember when and where I visited some place. I’ve tagged all my images to simplify finding and searching, but I welcome the day this is an automatic process.

Most of your financial transactions are documented and traceable today when you use a debit or credit card for paying. Often you even use a membership card to get other benefits as well.

Most of your movements are traceable today, whether you use a car with an Autopass chip to pass trough highway toll boots, or you pass traffic cameras that watch the traffic. If you fill gas at a gas station you pay using a credit or debit card. When you go by train you use an electronic train ticket containing an RFID chip. When you go by plane you pay by card and you have to show a picture ID before boarding the plane.

Actually you are filmed by surveillance cameras almost everywhere, and most of what you do at work is logged on your computer.

All of your life is already stored on a plethora of computers all over the world and the internet.

These are known issues and something we have seen emerging over several years. Science Fiction authors have suggested this for years and the last decade these issues have been and are discussed in mainstream literature and media as well. And this is only the beginning.

What this will have to say for us personally, for our security against ID-theft and against the misuse of personal information is probably something a lot of people already have felt.
As long as our information is as available as it is, id-theft and misuse of information will become more and more common. The only way to prevent this is to change the routines and the systems available for those that need to verify our identity. They need a more secure way to verify that we are who we say we are, and they need to increase their efforts for protecting our data.

The way technology improves and evolves makes the possibilities for tracking and storing all kinds of information better each day. A new generation of people where everything they do is documented, from the day they are born until the day they die, is not that far away. The documented generation!

I would venture the guess that very soon we will see solutions in the consumer market that enables us to document events while they happen in new and exciting ways. Things like video-goggles that store everything you see, hear and say while attending a meeting or conference. The information might be stored on small, flexible, secure and large storage devices or directly on network storages units. This information may even be integrated with GPS-data and other environment information like weather or temperature, or with auto tagging features that adds other automatic metadata to the different parts of the recording. Face-, object and speech recognition will be automated and stored together with video and sound. And maybe not that much further in the future, this might be available in a 3D video with better than HD-quality.

The benefits that come with this kind of easily available information will of course be both a curse and a boon for us users. I often wonder where I met some people for the first time or what some customer said about some technical problem. Together with the stored information and multimedia we will probably be able to cross-reference our ”life-stream” with all other kind of information. With automated image and speech recognition everything we do, experience and say will be searchable and analysable.

What do you think? How soon will this be available? In 15 years? In 10 or 20 years? Will it be possible to rewind you whole life?

And as a small idea: When will we see the possibility for creating alternate experiences that makes it look like you have led a more exciting life than you really have? Will we see jamming equipment for jamming people from recording you on their life-streams? If you have an idea, please add a comment below.

PS: Yes I am aware of this little thing from the US, but I am saying that people are willingly going to do this just because they can.

Google Chrome

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:36:54 +0200

Yesterday Google launched their new Google Chrome web browser. The follow-up in miscellaneous media has been enormous. I've tested it myself and I do find it a very interesting application. There are a few features I miss, but I guess Opera has made me a demanding web user. All in all I expect Google to release a solid and innovating new browser when the final version is finished. As usual regarding Google, a few questions concerning the content and other privacy issues do surface. The new secure surfing feature is great, but a few people have issues with the licensing terms:

"By submitting, posting or displaying the content you give Google a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute any content which you submit, post or display on or through, the services. This license is for the sole purpose of enabling Google to display, distribute and promote the services and may be revoked for certain services as defined in the additional terms of those services."

That is a direct quote from this article at Slashdot. I am not sure this is an issue to fear. It seems that they need that in order to display content on your screen, but we will see I guess.

Finally, if you have not seen the comic from Google explaining the new browser, please read it.

Blogging from Mac

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:20:54 +0200

There are several good blogging tools available for free for Microsoft Windows. Among else Microsoft Live Writer. I've been using that tool for some months, but I also wanted to find something similar for my MacBook. I've found several tools, but none that I liked that also was free.

But then I remembered something. One of the tools I tested for Windows was a plugin for Firefox. And yes. That plugin also works for Mac OS X. Actually... this blog entry is written in that tool - ScribeFire.

You might want to check out ScribeFire on your own. So far it looks like something I can use.

The Web Time Forgot

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:18:08 +0200

The New York Times has this very good article on early ideas of the world wide web. "The Web Time Forgot" describes the how a Belgian called Paul Otlet tried to index all known knowledge, and realised that this was too hard to do by paper alone. So in 1934 he dreamt up this concept of doing this with "electric telescopes". That is an electric device that would allow people to search and browse through millions of interlinked documents, images, audio and video files. According to NYT he described how people would use the devices to send messages to one another, share files and even collaborate or congregate in online social networks.

This proto-Web relied on a patchwork of analog index-card and telegraph machines, but it included an idea of a hyperlinked structure of information.

“This was a Steampunk version of hypertext,” said Kevin Kelly, former editor of Wired, who is writing a book about the future of technology.

I personally liked this little nugget.

...Otlet’s version of hypertext held a few important advantages over today’s Web. For one thing, he saw a smarter kind of hyperlink. Whereas links on the Web today serve as a kind of mute bond between documents, Otlet envisioned links that carried meaning by, for example, annotating if particular documents agreed or disagreed with each other.

The article goes one to discuss Semantic Web in a not so nice way. I admit that I don't agree with the author on that account, but all in all an interesting read.

Please read the original article in The New York Times.

Microsoft vs Google

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:27:25 +0100

Google has their Google Apps. Now Microsoft has opened up their Microsoft Office Live Spaces. It's their attempt at utilising MS Office and giving the public the tools for collaboration and sharing that Google Apps has been able to provide. I am looking forward to see what this leads to.

Semantic web and Topic maps

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:35:27 +0100

A colleague of mine has his own blog focusing mainly on Semantic technology. If you are interested I recommend you to read this entry(it's in Norwegian though). It's a reply to a comment in Computerworld late last year. I've translated some of the more interesting points.

"The Web was never meant to be only links between documents, and Tim did not make only technological choices. He made political choices too; he did not try to control the direction of the web development in any other way than to participate in the development trough the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)."

...

"While topic maps has a small foothold outside of Norway, RDF is a part of whole range of Semantic Web technologies that have put an entire industry in motion."

The author does not pull his punches.

Wish for 2008

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:54:26 +0100

When you read the news from anti-virus companies and security advisors you get convinced that 90% of the software you find on the net is malware, and the last 10% have so many security issues that it turns out the same thing. At the same time a life seems to be worth less than the copyright interests of media companies.

I don’t know if you have noticed, but I feel that the whole world has been overrun by solutions and programs that want to harvest personal information about me. The products that don’t ask for the information grab it anyway.

Trusted computing is a much debated architecture, maybe rightfully so. That kind of architecture might limit the spreading of free/open source software. Microsoft has proven that they can offer this trough their HD-Video support. There they have signed code in all layers, and only approved hardware devices are allowed in the pipe from storage media to screen. I am not saying that it is impossible to bypass this pipe in some way, but the threshold to perform such a hack has been raised a fair bit.

So, when you consider the stack of components needed to display HD-Video, what do you need to have the same security/quality for our computers? Especially when you are connected to the Internet?

The question then is if we maybe should take a look at this “cursed” subject again. Financing solutions in order to secure that open source software can be verified and approved might become a reality. There is one thing that we have learned so far. It is impossible to count all evil. You cannot permit the execution of all software except the bad ones listed in a list. Such a list will never be complete. But you can allow all enumerated good software and block the execution of all other code. Anti-virus software tries to perform this enumeration on our behalf, but still they do not know everything and ask the users what to do when in doubt. When they do, the s**t hits the fan. Users do not know what to do. They do not realize the consequences of their choices.

Again, the driver is the money. It is somewhat of a symptom of the state of the world that it’s more important for Microsoft that a video is not copied than to secure the personal information of a user. If somebody steals all our personal details, all our money from our bank accounts and our identity, that is not as important for Microsoft as a video unlawfully duplicated and distributed.

So what is my wish for 2008?

My wish is that our lives and our identities will become more important to protect on the net than the economic interests of a few.

What's that on the web? It's a sheep... no it's a pig... no it's...

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:50:32 +0100

So, one of the weird stories today on Digg is about these pigs that someone claims are a cross between sheep and pigs. Not so, they are a special breed of pigs called Mangalitza. But hey, they look funny anyway.

The picture is copied from pigparadise.com.

Bruce Schneier: Security in ten years

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 10:11:51 +0100

Bruce Schneier have this little gem available on his site today. Bruce and Marcus Ranum are discussing security issues and trying to guess where the field will be in ten years time. I've got to say that they are painting a somewhat bleak picture, and I sincerely hope that they are wrong in some of their assumptions, but I fear that they are probably correct.

National laws vs Internet

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:13:57 +0100

I've been out travelling and thus this site has not been updated for a few days. But when I found this little article I had to give it some consideration. A site in Canada hosted musical scores that where in the public domain in Canada, but an Austrian music publisher felt that if you put anything online then you have to follow all the laws of EVERY nation in the world. (They were actually speaking of copyright laws, but ... ). Now this has some considerable effects. Do they really think that a web shop can follow all the laws of every nation when it comes to e-commerce? This has to be resolved - very quickly!

Encryption and security

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:35:24 +0100

Maybe it's not as secure as you think. According it this article and the following post on Slashdot, Hushmail has been caught red-handed in backstabbing their own marketing.

"The only way to decrypt or unscramble Hush messages is by using your passphrase when you open up your Hushmail account. Carnivore cannot decrypt your mail, and is therefore, powerless against messages sent between Hush users."

Now it seems that they have handed over the private keys of users to the government, and thus voided their own technology. I would guess that they soon will have a few trust issues with their customers. I am not going to discuss the old saying, "if you are not doing anything wrong, why do you worry about the government reading your email".

At the same time some people within the U.S. government wants to redefine "privacy" so that it doesn't include anonymity, and that NSA seems to have included a backdoor to a random number generator for use in encryption programs.

Researcher: Half a million database servers have no firewall

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:39:03 +0100

As a computer consultant I find this quite disturbing.

Blogs from the famous

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:32:37 +0100

It's is amazing who you can find blogging around the net. Recently Marc Andreessen of previous Netscape fame started blogging. And now I have found Stephen Fry. I leave it up to you to find other famous, or not so famous, people in the blogosphere.

The 10 Most Puzzling Ancient Artifacts. Really??

nospam@example.com (Jon Leirdal) — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 17:29:11 +0100

Pretty sensational isn't it? If you check out the article The 10 Most Puzzling Ancient Artifacts or an alternative version here, it seems a bit too god to be true. I am probably quite gullible, but not when it comes to articles like this.

If you do a quick search on Wikipedia several of these gets debunked instantly.

The Grooved Spheres or the Klerksdorp spheres are natural.
The Dropa Stones seems to be a hoax.
The Ica Stones seems to be a hoax. Here is another site that debunks this.
The Antikythera Mechanism is real, but not necessary something beyond the skills of a very skilled man of that era.
The Baghdad Battery is probably not a battery.
The Coso artifact is obviously not 500.000 years old. That kind of stone can not be used for dating.
Ancient Model Aircraft seems to be disputed. But to make models of birds is something mankind has done for thousand of years so I am curious, and I am thinking, why not.
Giant Stone Balls of Costa Rica. I would have called them spheres, but hey... I think this site explains it better.
Impossible Fossils seems to be fakes or misinterpreted.
Out of place metal objects. These seems to be fakes. At least neither I nor other sites can find a reliable source where they are mentioned. They are only mentioned on sites having this list.

This list has been debunked several times before I see. Oh well. Now it has been done once more.

Wonder why they forgot this little nugget, the helicopter hieroglyph.